|
Developer
seeks to loosen rules on county watersheds
By Randall Rigsbee
What attorney Nick Robinson, representing a
Raleigh developer proposing a 185-home subdivision called Williams Pond
along the Haw River in Bynum, called a “modest amendment to Chatham
County’s watershed regulations” would, according to numerous speakers at
a public hearing Monday night, open up all the county’s river corridors.
Robinson is representing Bynum Ridge LLC
and its plans to build Williams Pond, a gated, 185-home development on
650 acres near Bynum off Bynum Ridge Road.
Part of the development, which would be
split by Pokeberry Creek, would abut the Haw River and the developer
seeks to build 59 homes in the watershed area, though currently 48 are
permitted.
The development would be built in two
different watershed areas, one with zoning that allows five-acre average
lot sizes, the other allowing one-acre minimum lot sizes.
The developer is seeking a change in the
county’s watershed protection ordinance, which is more stringent than
state guidelines, to combine both zoning districts so the overall
density of the development remains the same but allows more houses to be
built closer to the river.
Robinson said the proposal is “sensible,
measured, reasonable and consistent with the intent to protect the
watershed.”
And even if the county approves the change
in the watershed protection rules, Robinson said, developers would still
require a conditional use permit for developments along river corridors.
Robinson further noted that Chatham
County’s rules are already more stringent than those the state allows,
comparing the watershed protection ordinance to speed limits.
more- See Thursday, November 18 paper:
Vol 84, No.51
Landowner wants graves
relocated
By Randall Rigsbee
More than 100 years ago, Chatham County
operated a home for indigent residents and the site near Pittsboro
included a pauper’s gravesite where approximately 250 residents were
buried.
In the early part of the 20th
century, the county discontinued the home and later sold the property
near NC 902 to a private landowner.
The graves were, apparently, forgotten and
today the four-acre gravesite is heavily wooded with few obvious signs
the property was ever used as a cemetery.
Now, Paul James Wolf, who has owned the
property at 163 Falcons Way near Pittsboro for about 10 years, wants to
move the graves, which he discovered about two years ago, to another
piece of property about a half mile away.
Moving the graves requires the permission
of the Chatham County Board of Commissioners and on Monday, an attorney
representing Wolf asked commissioners to grant the request.
At first, according to attorney Sean
Carton, Wolf and his wife thought the graves were tire ruts.
“It’s in very thick woods, a lot of
underbrush,” Carton said. “There are no tombstones to indicate who these
people were, unfortunately.”
more- See Thursday, November 18 paper:
Vol 84, No.51
|

Jeff Davis photo
Baking chicken the
old-fashioned way . . .
Carol Pleu turns a chicken,
partially seen, at Sunday’s Molasses Festival in Snow Camp. Pleu was on
hand to show folks how food was cooked long ago. The chicken, cooked
this way, was sometimes stuffed with potatoes and apples, and could take
up to two hours to get done, according to how close to the fire the
chicken was.
County to review waste disposal option
By Randall Rigsbee
In late summer, Chatham County
commissioners decided to seek proposals from private companies for waste
disposal options for the county and soon a committee will begin
reviewing the half-dozen proposals the county has received.
When commissioners proposed taking
proposals from solid waste disposal companies in June, chairman Tommy
Emerson emphasized the county is “not committing to anything. We’re just
trying to flesh out the possibilities.”
Commissioners have had an ongoing
discussion in recent years about future solid waste options for the
county and the proposals authorized by the board last summer are a means
of gathering more data.
The proposals will allow the county to
study the cost of privatizing the county’s waste management division and
waste disposal options.
Commissioners have said their
goal is to gather data from various private solid waste companies for an
“apples-to-apples” comparison between what those companies can offer
compared to the county-operated program.
more- See Thursday, November 18 paper:
Vol 84, No.51 |